So... it's cost prohibitive???


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Darth Renn at host252.heath.com on October 20, 1999 at 18:20:04:

In Reply to: Re: Film Question for the 'in-the-know' posted by Vincent on October 19, 1999 at 21:31:37:


: Be aware that the digital footage will NOT match the film footage at all- if you're going for this type of stylistic contrast, then good.

Thanks, Vincent. I was trying for a different look, in order to create a frenetic pace to some of the scenes.... But the big question is whether or not it will detract from the moment itself.

: As for cost issues, the digital footage will have to be transfered to Super-16 film in order to be cut into your negative, and this is costly.

I guess this is where I will run into a snag. I figured that it would be cost effective to shoot in digital vs. film for the scenes that require many angles and larger numbers of takes. The action/fight sequences I visualized took into account the potential for leveraging the multiple takes and angles that I could afford to do in digital. It sounds like it will be cost prohibitive to do the transfer, however.

hmmm...





Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

E-Mail/Userid:
Password:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


  


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]