No Chirstopher Lee.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by ghostmann at 209.162.83.22 on November 17, 1999 at 19:43:59:

In Reply to: Do you perhaps mean Lee as in Tommy Lee Jones? posted by Chiusano on November 17, 1999 at 18:48:39:

:
: : I really doubt Kevin can market Clerks 2 very well with O'Halloran and Anderson in the staring roles. He need Big names like Lee to drawn people in the theaters.

: Because if you mean Jason Lee, then you are mistaken. I'm one of the guy's biggest fans, but he is presently neither a big name nor a draw.

: Besides, even with Affleck or someone in it, the movie's box office ceiling is probably $20 mil at best. This isn't exactly the sequel the whole of America has been clamoring for. It ain't Indy 4.

: Chiusano

Jason Lee has a better draw then O'Halloran and Anderson, that's a fact jack! haveing Jason Lee in Clerks 2 rather then the other two is a Multi-Million dollar differnce.

:ghostmann

Follow Ups:

I'd pay $7.50 to see Christopher Lee as Randall Neil 19:48:01 11/17/99 (0)

Post a Followup

E-Mail/Userid:
Password:

Subject:

Comments:
: : : : : I really doubt Kevin can market Clerks 2 very well with O'Halloran and Anderson in the staring roles. He need Big names like Lee to drawn people in the theaters. : : Because if you mean Jason Lee, then you are mistaken. I'm one of the guy's biggest fans, but he is presently neither a big name nor a draw. : : Besides, even with Affleck or someone in it, the movie's box office ceiling is probably $20 mil at best. This isn't exactly the sequel the whole of America has been clamoring for. It ain't Indy 4. : : Chiusano : Jason Lee has a better draw then O'Halloran and Anderson, that's a fact jack! haveing Jason Lee in Clerks 2 rather then the other two is a Multi-Million dollar differnce. : :ghostmann : :ghostmann

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]