Posted by The Dancing Tree at 212.85.30.2 on December 30, 1999 at 09:19:57:
In Reply to: This is what the summaries have to say... posted by turtle on December 30, 1999 at 08:02:22:
... would, IMO, be a very big mistake. If there's any real point to making
that movie, surely part of it will hinge on the fact that in the last four
or so years both Dante and Randall have done nothing with their lives.
Anderson may have been a pain to work with, but the results were good, and
replacing him with someone else wouldn't have the same effect, even Jason
Lee.
I take it eveyone noticed Jay's subtle line in Dogma, "Perhaps we should go
back to Quick Stop (sp?)"?
Last thought: JA is voicing Randall in the Clerks cartoon, so I guess his
reappearance in the ever expanding Jersey Trilogy isn't totally unlikely.
I still don't understand why Kevin wants to do Clerks 2 though. When one
has a fantastic standalone movie, it's all too easy to reduce its
importance with a sequel, and there are far too many examples in movie
history to even begin listing them! Mind you, Kevin hasn't screwed up yet,
so maybe I'll just s