Posted by Wolveroach at ac8f7637.ipt.aol.com on June 02, 2000 at 11:58:05:
In Reply to: Inconsisantcy's between movie &cartoon posted by Draven T. Corvus on June 02, 2000 at 11:50:32:
Aren't inconsistencies at all.
:
: -Randals last name being "Graves", but according to Katelyn His last name is "Reeves". "Well Randal Reeves scurge of the video rental."
Last name is Graves. Caitlin has bad diction and a bit of a lisp (that I always found a little sexy...). That's all.
: -Randal and Dante both worked at the Quick Stop and RST, not one at one and the other at the other. this has 2 quotes, Dante trying to not have to come in on his day off says in part, "...Why don't you call Randal?" Next is where Dante is trying to talk some sence into Randal about going to Julie's Wake, "We are employee's of the Quick Stop/RST Video respectivly..."
"Respectively" implies to different places, but aside from that, they have the same boss, so they probably work at the other store if necessary.
: -The date Randal uses in the trial. He uses Feb 27, 1997. now how does the cartoon fit in the time line of your movies. Time line goes as followed; MallRats, Clerks, Chasing Amy, and Dogma. Also how does this affect the Clerks 2 screenplay?
Clerks: The Cartoon isn't "canon," to use the Star Wars lingo. It's just playing with the characters and central concepts of the film. And Clerks 2 is dead, dead, dead.