Posted by The Hockey Guy at 134.68.73.54 on June 02, 2000 at 12:04:27:
In Reply to: Inconsisantcy's between movie &cartoon posted by Draven T. Corvus on June 02, 2000 at 11:50:32:
: -Randals last name being "Graves", but according to Katelyn His last name is "Reeves". "Well Randal Reeves scurge of the video rental."
its graves. she says "randal graves"
: -Randal and Dante both worked at the Quick Stop and RST, not one at one and the other at the other. this has 2 quotes, Dante trying to not have to come in on his day off says in part, "...Why don't you call Randal?" Next is where Dante is trying to talk some sence into Randal about going to Julie's Wake, "We are employee's of the Quick Stop/RST Video respectivly..."
respectivly inplies that dante is an employee of quick stop, and randal at RST. as someone else said, since they have the same boss, it only makes sense they would cover for each other
: -The date Randal uses in the trial. He uses Feb 27, 1997. now how does the cartoon fit in the time line of your movies. Time line goes as followed; MallRats, Clerks, Chasing Amy, and Dogma. Also how does this affect the Clerks 2 screenplay?
i think you are missing the joke of the date. randal just pulled the date out of his ass.thats over three years ago...dante had NO CLUE where he was on some random day three years ago! thats why he said "probably at the store" it was a joke that randal is proving dante has no idea what he is doing because he cant remember where he was on a random day three and half years ago.