Posted by Isis at d3197.dialup.cornell.edu on June 20, 2000 at 11:42:47:
In Reply to: Re: If she was going to be ALL natural... posted by RavenousGoat on June 20, 2000 at 11:32:48:
: : And I still don't understand why, if they truly are neutered, Serendipity has breasts. Cosmetic surgery? She can't have kids, so she doesn't need them as milk receptacles. I guess it was just an excuse for a strip club scene.
: ok obviously you didn't get that whole strip club scene...she needed a full womens body so she could come on earth and be a writer w/o anyone noticing a difference. and she became a stripper b/c she went broke b/c she couldn't think of any ideas.
Okay, why would she need breasts in order to be a writer? Do female writers publish topless pic book jackets? Have you seen Patricia Cornwall's nekkid boobs *shudder*? Serendipity can't be getting freaky with anybody since she doesn't have the proper equipment, so they're not needed as sex toys.
Honey let me tell you something...with a couple of squishy gel packs and a lot of cosmetics, there are people in Utah who have gone through ten years of marriage without their spouses every catching on to them not having breasts, not to mention lacking the appropriate genetalia. I don't see how Serendipity couldn't have gotten away with it.
Had she anticipated the stripper thing, it would have made more sense.
-- Isis
I'm just happy it was an excuse for a Dwight Ewell cameo.