i think jim jacks might be involved

Posted by goatboy116 at webcachew09b.cache.pol.co.uk on June 28, 2000 at 14:01:47:

In Reply to: Re: capalert! posted by Tishel Aromatic on June 28, 2000 at 13:55:52:

this isnt a criticism of jim in any way, but i was overjoyed to see that they accused american history X of having too much "potty mouth!"

Follow Ups:

• Re: i think jim jacks might be involved Tishel Aromatic 14:05:37 6/28/00 (2)
  • i'm beginning to doubt their integrity... goatboy116 14:18:33 6/28/00 (1)
    • Re: i'm beginning to doubt their integrity... Cephallus 15:03:37 6/28/00 (0)

Post a Followup