Posted by o9mmrocks at h00009498a0aa.ne.mediaone.net on July 21, 2000 at 23:53:50:
In Reply to: My thoughts on posted by Torgo on July 21, 2000 at 05:55:10:
it wasn't that bad. at least not what i remember of it. It was a nice fun blow-up movie, if you were expecting any more then you are the one who should be tied to a chair and burned.
as for the writer: ok, arlington rd. was one of the biggest disappiontments of my lifetime, or in the history of cinema. arlington rd. deserved the kind of review you gave reindeer games. reindeer games was ok. Scream 3 was really good!
and no im not saying that to suck up to the higher ups who had cameos in it. it was good.
i hated scream, i really liked scream 2 and i thought scream 3 was just as good, maybe better...i havent seen it in 1/2 a year so my memory of it is pretty foggy, but i definitly remember being impressed.
if a scream 4 is made, i will be upset. 3 is a perfect number of scream movies.
the only downside i can think of was a constant downside in all 3 scream movies...that silly whore neve campbell never died!
what the hell? scream 2 could've been home alone 4 and i still would have been happy if they killed that horrible excuse for an actress in the first scream.
scream 3 could've been led zepplin records played backwards for 2 hours(which actually wouldve been better then arlington rd.) if they killed god damn neve campbell in scream 2.
thats it, im done.
sorry for wasting everyones time