Posted by Isis at 147.129.97.27 on March 31, 2001 at 17:16:32:
In Reply to: Re: The point is Jason isn't Scientology Spokesman... posted by carlo marx on March 31, 2001 at 17:05:20:
There, now we can keep on talking about the subject until the cows come home.
Anyway, I'm sorry for not explaining myself adequately earlier, but what I meant was the original post saying basically that Scientology is dangerous and Jason should be careful, blase blah etc., was inappropriate for the reasons I mentioned. As for discussions about Scientology itself this just isn't the proper forum.
: he's dead. i doubt he'll be able to answer my questions.
So they'd have YOU think.
: who's demanding? i just asked, in general, "what the fuck is going on inside that place?" that wasn't a question to jason. i was asking a question that i wasn't really expecting an answer to. you're definitely taking it out of context.
Well, I did, but if it's not related to Jason there's no point in talking about it here.
: b. you're referring to history. what i'm referring to is still happening (allegedly). if the abuses are factual, then in the proper forum
: i have every right to question the church's tactics.
Absolutely, you have the right. This just isn't the place. If you wanna e-mail me to talk Scientology I've got no problem with that, but I don't really know much about the religion so I don't know what I'd add to the conversation. Sorry for coming off all aggressive-like.
-- Isis