Posted by bobblekin at webcachem06b.cache.pol.co.uk on June 24, 2001 at 08:05:56:
In Reply to: You're right, Caulfield, I'm not "tuff" in reality posted by Pseudo on June 24, 2001 at 00:37:09:
Has anyone else on here noted the meaning of Psuedo? Quite unsuprising really, when you think about how pathetic and moronic our friend here is. It means fake, kiddies. Could it be, and i don't mean to speculate, that the one who calls himself psuedo is trying to tell us that he's just a "fake" wankstain, by using complex terminology, when in fact he is little more than an irritating lump of dry semen?
I can almost see the replies already, a torrent of bitterness and rudeness. I imagine the wankstain will pick me up on not capitalising my i's, and anything else he chooses isn't up to his standard. But frankly, little boy, i think most people on here are done with your standards, and your attempt to cover up the truth about your being a catastrophic waste of precious board space, with far too much time on his hands. (time, i hasten to add, that he spends attempting to connect to this site to highlight our spelling mistakes, quirks, or anything else that adds to his tempest of PMS.
BY THE WAY, if these comments which many members enjoy posting about your inadequacy are fuelling an ejactulation of bitterness and infantile rage, then please, do not hesitate to simply stay offline, or at least away from these boards, or, if you feel you must (to prove your flagging reliabilty with all things film-related), then please do retort, for your incessant ramblings are proving to be quite enterntaining.