Posted by GuruAskew at spider-tq022.proxy.aol.com on September 10, 2001 at 21:52:40:
In Reply to: Re: Ok, if "AI" is a Kubrick film... posted by lucid on September 10, 2001 at 17:40:45:
No Text, douchebag.
: : If "A.I." is a Kubrick film because he was responsible for most of the
: Let me spell it out for you since your brains have apparently been replaced with cow dung.
: H-U-M-O-R
: I said, "Kubrick sucks (seen AI yet?)" as a tongue-in-cheek comment about choosing Kevin over Kubrick (although in reality I actually WOULD). Then some movie-nazi seems to think Kubrick had nothing to do with it, thus the link reference.
: Now a thousand assholes all feel the need to "prove it wasn't Kubrick".
: Fuck you. Get over yourself. Let it die.
: > Also, for the record, I'm with Vincent on the subject of the quality
: > of "A.I.". I agree that it's "near brilliant" as Vincent said, and I'm
: > a major Kubrick fan and pretty big Spielberg fan.
: Where the hell do you see that? Not in THIS thread....
: Talking to imaginary friends again?