Re: Accoridng to TIE-Fighter he was a Vice-Admiral


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by LL at 169.3.126.53 on March 08, 2002 at 14:48:15:

In Reply to: Accoridng to TIE-Fighter he was a Vice-Admiral... posted by Honor_Spider on March 08, 2002 at 14:46:37:

Besides, after the whole who taught Obi-Wan gaff in Episode I, would such an oversight really be all that bad?

: Shortly before the second Death Star became fully operational over Endor, so I don't think it's too unreasonable.

: : : I was visiting Star Wars.com today, being the Fanboy that I am (And fuckin' proud of it! NERD REPRESENT!), and I saw the results of a poll that asked What Expanded Unvierse SW Character would poeple most like to see in Episode III. It was a tight race judging by the numbers, but the solid winner with 54% was everybody's favorite SW Novel character Grand Admiral Thrawn (though for EpII he'd probably be a Captain or soemthing). Is this fucking cool or what? I bet Timothy Zahn would be happy.

: : (showing the fanboy that I used to be) because he was a slave during that period. He only advanced to Admiral after Episode VI in the book chronology. That means during the Empire's rule he was working up the ranks, but not before that. And Episode IV starts with the Empire just becoming a monarchy.




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

E-Mail/Userid:
Password:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


  


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]