Re: JACKIE BROWN


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by ThirtySeven?!?! at ip68-1-123-63.pn.at.cox.net on April 29, 2002 at 07:25:27:

In Reply to: Re: JACKIE BROWN posted by Banky on April 27, 2002 at 13:28:57:

: : I agree 100%. It wasn't PULP FICTION so it was immediately declared a "disappointment", but it was an incredibly compelling flick.

: I really never compared the two. For me they were two different animals. I mean, the stories are completely different. The only reason for me to compare them is simply because they're Tarantino flicks. I mean, it's like comparing Mallrats to Chasing Amy. (A bad idea anyway, but alas...) They different movies with different stories.

: Jackie Brown could never have been Pulp Fiction, and that's why it was a dissapointment.

Jackie Brown was a great movie, got boring at times, yet Samuel L. Jackson's words of "AK - 47 , when you absolutely positively have to kill every mother f*cker in the room, except no substitutions" is a quote i'll never forget.




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

E-Mail/Userid:
Password:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


  


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]