Posted by tomkinite at 24.215.45.238 on June 17, 2002 at 12:55:08:
In Reply to: Oh, Ming, just ban this dude already posted by sean on June 17, 2002 at 12:47:58:
You make this TOOOO easy. But, I think the fun is over. Now you will just reflect for the next half hour -- in posts -- how much of a dumbass *I* am for getting you going (and yes, this would indeed qualify as "getting riled up", don't bullshit yourself) at the same time explaining how much I am an idiot for wasting my time on the board while you reply frantically for the next hour. Heh.
You'd be surprised as to how little your messages reflect me in actuality. I think it was obvious and pretty well assumed this type of response would come about, and further posts only contribute to the fact, not OPPOSE it.
Have fun replying. I'll be sure to come back and have another laugh.
: : Not only do View Askew posters get upset about multiple topics, they can't handle words used more than once!
: I think it was the 'mis-used' that Mad responded to, if you want to read whole words instead of just parts of them.
: : Heaven forbid having some sort of opposing viewpoint or diversity. Sorry, I typically don't want to hail "Kevin Smith" on every post. If I wanted to join a cult, I'd join the ranks with a religious organization of some kind.
: I'm pretty convinced this is the same guy who keeps posting crap and then, if somebody complains, saying that he's trying to post an "opposing viewpoint". Well, dude, you proved your point was wrong, because it had nothing to do with opposing viewpoints, it's you that nobody likes. Your "friend" is laughing at you. Trust me, anybody else reading this is. [If not, I'd love to hear from him too, since the depth of your patheticness wouldn't be half as much as his for being the only person laughing with you and not at you. But, then, of course, he doesn't exist.]