Posted by Kev Hoffman at 1cust119.tnt1.random-lake.wi.da.uu.net on August 01, 2002 at 16:43:27:
I wrote a little Rule Thingy for them...i think I'm missing some things so please tell me what they are...i might just put this up at a certain crapper site.
To All The Newbies Across The Land…
You wishes have been answered,
Never as planned.
I have set forth a great book of wisdom,
To help the little View Askew Kingdom.
Here In Lies, after tribulation and privation, the truths to this Askew world that we all embrace to be true:
The Following remarks are not regarded as tolerable in these mysterious parts of the web community:
-Any comment referring to the absence or void viewings of the characters Jay and Silent Bob.
-Any hateful slander against the true ruler of the community, Kevin Smith, Duke of Red Bank.
-Misconceptions of the viewings of any of Kevin Smith’s pieces.
-Exploiting previously known information to the community, as new-fangled and innovative subject matter, for which to base any response to.
-Tagging slanderous terms to groups of words, in a specific order to, thus stimulating a wrangle among your neighbors of the community.
-Overabundently using the following terms coined by the Jason Mewes Prince of Leonardo,: “Snootchie Bootchies” “Bong” (in any number of the sign of “o” included) and “snoogans”
-To, anymore, discuss the addition of Jennifer Lopez, the Duchess of Pop, to one of Kevin Smith’s, the Duke of Red Bank’s, created works.
The subsequent information will generate tension among you, “The Newbie”, and them “The Regulars”
-The misuse or omitted practice of using the sacred signed of *NT* to signify no further statements in the internal body of the original statement.
-The misuse or omitted practice of using the sacred sign of *repost* to signify the following area under discussion has been brought to the communities attention before the present time, and is now under consideration to be revamped for the following: 1) the issue at hand calls for the previous message to be viewed again, as to it pertains to the subject now under conversation. 2) A community member has a misconception about this field of topic, and it is needed for the clearing of the subject. 3) The community discussion at the time was dawdling at the time of the topic’s original birth into the communities discussion locale
-The repeated occurrences of a subject being continually brought to the communities attention.
-The overabundance of opinion to the discussion located in the communities area of deliberatation.
-Topics of incoherent meaning.
-Subjects not pertaining to anything important in the eyes of “The Regulars” and More importantly to Kevin Smith Duke of Red Bank.
-The act of neglecting to examine the sacred scriptures (a la “the Summaries“) will result in a public display of verbal brutality, so please take the time and study these forgotten manuscripts.