Yes, because consenting sexual activity...

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Steven Kilpatrick (TheMadSpin) at dsc08.dai-tx-5-4.rasserver.net on August 09, 2002 at 18:30:28:

In Reply to: I might be wrong but posted by KPSmithee on August 09, 2002 at 18:17:14:

is a direct affront to a cause attacking non-consenting sexual activity and showing breasts to someone you don't even know, is right on par with pure incestual activity.

I mean, if people want to have consenting sex or make incestual remarks like, "hey stranger who I'm not related to, I'll can't willingly show you my breasts right now," and if the people being talked to say stuff like, "that's ok, I didn't really want you to show your breasts," which everyone knows is a form of rape since it shows so much force and violation... well they sure as hell shouldn't do it if they're anti rape and incest.

It's pure evil.

Yep.

Follow Ups:

Exactly nt Rosie55 18:33:42 8/09/02 (14)
- nt notaprettygirl 18:35:28 8/09/02 (13)
  - nt = No Titties nt Campbell Wilson 19:30:28 8/09/02 (0)
  - There was a time when my Klingon ways would.... Steven Kilpatrick (TheMadSpin) 18:37:44 8/09/02 (10)
    - Re: There was a time when my Klingon ways would... notaprettygirl 18:39:28 8/09/02 (9)
      - You do what you want mamma.. Rosie55 18:40:47 8/09/02 (8)
        
        Exactly, he has a tendency to berate the ideas... Steven Kilpatrick (TheMadSpin) 18:41:55 8/09/02 (7)
        
        What the FUCK KPSmithee 18:45:32 8/09/02 (4)
        
        Letting it lie would include not having posted Steven Kilpatrick (TheMadSpin) 18:54:02 8/09/02 (3)
        
        Hmmm, OK KPSmithee 18:59:38 8/09/02 (0)
        
        with that in mind I suggest all of you SHAFTR 18:57:04 8/09/02 (1)
        
        Opportunists R' Us *NT* Steven Kilpatrick (TheMadSpin) 18:58:56 8/09/02 (0)
        
        Though I could heed my own advice, and I shall. NT Steven Kilpatrick (TheMadSpin) 18:43:05 8/09/02 (1)
        
        heehee *nt* Rosie55 18:44:01 8/09/02 (0)
  - "nt" means no text... who cares who sent the paper 18:37:38 8/09/02 (0)
Re: Yes, because consenting sexual activity... notaprettygirl 18:31:43 8/09/02 (5)
- The sarcasm contained within that post was not... Steven Kilpatrick (TheMadSpin) 18:33:29 8/09/02 (4)
  - The point I was trying to make Mr. Sarcastic Man KPSmithee 18:37:19 8/09/02 (2)
    - Sorry about pointless rants... didn't know you had Steven Kilpatrick (TheMadSpin) 18:39:45 8/09/02 (1)
      - Touche' (NT) KPSmithee 18:40:51 8/09/02 (0)
  - Re: The sarcasm contained within that post was not notaprettygirl 18:34:48 8/09/02 (0)

Post a Followup

E-Mail/Userid:
Password:

Subject:

Comments:
: is a direct affront to a cause attacking non-consenting sexual activity and showing breasts to someone you don't even know, is right on par with pure incestual activity. : I mean, if people want to have consenting sex or make incestual remarks like, "hey stranger who I'm not related to, I'll can't willingly show you my breasts right now," and if the people being talked to say stuff like, "that's ok, I didn't really want you to show your breasts," which everyone knows is a form of rape since it shows so much force and violation... well they sure as hell shouldn't do it if they're anti rape and incest. : It's pure evil. : Yep.

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]