Posted by KPSmithee at 204.137.52.218 on August 27, 2002 at 14:52:12:
In Reply to: so what if he had only 48 hours..... posted by Duffless on August 27, 2002 at 14:44:51:
: :having the film wait too long to get to a point is death in a film, especially a short film.....I didn't say it sucked, I just got bored, it was an honest answer, hopefully he will appreciate a reply that offers constructive criticism, over one that is just "not bad for 48 hours" which if you think about it is kind of an insult without any contrustive element to it...like saying "not too smelly for a pile of shit".....his movie was not shit, it just seemed to go nowhere for too long, but like I said the appointment guy was excellent and the camerawork was good...
I was just saying just consider he had only 48 hours to make it. I think if he would have had more time to go over it with a fine tooth comb alot of the editing could have been fixed to speed up the process. Sorry I did not mean to make you think your critique was not warranted. I was just saying take that into account.