2 IS low. n/t


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Barry, Suave MF at host-4-17-193-113.lordbissell.com on December 06, 2002 at 14:33:44:

In Reply to: 2 isn't low. posted by pinkie1984@attbi.com (virgo) on December 06, 2002 at 14:27:11:

: : : Obviously the more megapixels, the better. But, how much do you really need? Is 2.0 good enough, or will I really be disappointed if I try to blow up any pictures?

: : : Your help is appreciated!

: : : B

: : I would recommend 3 or above. At 3 Megapixels you can have a 11"x14" with the same resolution as a normal camera. You can buy a 3 Megapixel for around $200 easy. Depending on what you want to do, they have 4 & 5 Megapixels in the $500-$700 range. Also be sure you have a Opitcal Zoom rather than a Digital Zoom.

: I have a 2.5 and it is freaking FANTASTIC.




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

E-Mail/Userid:
Password:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


  


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]