Posted by Raikus at pcp02547486pcs.micske01.fl.comcast.net on December 06, 2002 at 14:35:33:
In Reply to: 2 isn't low. posted by pinkie1984@attbi.com (virgo) on December 06, 2002 at 14:27:11:
: Is 2.0 good enough, or will I really be disappointed if I try to blow up any pictures?
If he plans on blowing up picture he needs a higher quality that a 2. If you double a 2 Megapixel image there's obvious pixelation. A 2 is fine for (As Andee said) the 4"x6" range or normal picture you will put on the web, but because of his statement I would recommend around a 3.