Posted by Nate Dogg at pa-indiana1a-657.pit.adelphia.net on December 04, 2002 at 13:16:30:
In Reply to: No, he's not... posted by Nate Dogg on December 04, 2002 at 13:12:07:
"I would think his progression of films would definately lead him in the direction you say, into making more powerful and more meaningful films, but to "close the book" on your past ... on what got you to where you are today, I'd think that's foolish"
What got him here today was Clerks. What kept him in the game after Mallrats bombed was Chasing Amy. It's the slapsticky stuff that veers from what got him here today.
Just my own theories. Take 'em for what they are.
-- Nate