Posted by powdered toast man at u153n7.eastlink.ca on January 21, 2003 at 18:25:28:
In Reply to: Pasted here posted by printdude on January 21, 2003 at 17:58:07:
: Judge Barzilay, through a spokesman, said that she would let her 32-page decision speak for itself. But she described in her ruling how she subjected many of the figures to "comprehensive examinations." At times, that included "the need to remove the clothes of the figure."
that was just funny
: "Here's a guy who changes his clothes in a phone booth and flies through the air," says Cooper. "Does that mean he's now an animal?"
everyone knows superman is from krypton, he's not a human.
and what are all these comic book guys worried about, aren't the mutants supposed to be classified as homo sapien superior? humans are defined as a member of the genus Homo and especially of the species H. sapiens. that kinda makes them human to some degree, would you consider homo erectus or homo habilus or neanderthal human? sure they have human characteristics but the farthest anyone of them ever developped was equivalent to a 2 year old human. I don't know where i'm going here, maybe I should shut up, it's just about that company wanting more money.