Posted by sean at 170.148.92.44 on February 26, 2003 at 18:06:22:
In Reply to: Seany-poo? posted by Young Nasty Man on February 26, 2003 at 17:53:50:
... I'm at work for a big chunk of the day, and a lot of what I'm doing is waiting while this really slow search engine searches, so I flip over here, and if something gets as much attention as this picture thing, I'll take a look. [Actually, I think I just clicked on it 'cause it said 'fark' and I was like 'huh?']
: It seems like anytime anyone "attacks" anything viewaskew related you jump into action, reading the post carefully and using their own words to your own advantage.
I'm glad it looks that way, but I honestly put very little thought or effort into the posts. It's mostly that I'm responding to stupidity but, you may occassionally notice, I get flustered quickly when the person fires back something smart. Luckily, it doesn't happen often.
: I imagine that you have a stamp that you use on the side of your computer monitor everytime you achieve another "victory".
Nah, but it's funny that after all these years, I still have a touch of the, if I remember correctly, "self-styled vigilante of the WWWBoards" in me that I was in high school. [old joke, sorry.]
: And this isnt an "attack" either, so relax, I think yer a pretty smart cat. You should probably write tax laws for the IRS or some such nonesense...
I don't know how to take that last line, but I'll just laugh, 'cause you're a D fan.
I deleted the beginning of your post by mistake, and am too lazy to re-write what I just wrote, but I *do* like arguing, when it's good arguing. JohnDalton, for instance, is usually a really good arguer, he and I go back and forth a lot on ANP. Or Isis/kate/whatever she's posting as this week. But this stuff isn't arguing, to me. If the other guy makes no coherent points, then I'll just keep batting at him until I get bored, which doesn't usually take very long. That ain't arguing.