That sgould be should *NT


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Lokileby at 205.211.11.12 on March 17, 2003 at 16:06:51:

In Reply to: That sgould be under Altmann's post! *NT posted by Guy Stokes on March 17, 2003 at 16:02:58:

: : : simple one here:

: : : Pornography - is it...?

: : : a) good for a laugh?
: : : b) an exploitation of women?
: : : c) great masturbatory material?
: : : d) as c), but as long as the hairy dude with the big cock stays out of the way?

: : I was about to say that, but you said it first. Well done!




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

E-Mail/Userid:
Password:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


  


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]