Posted by CorporateSlutSophisticated at 66.205.8.2 on July 18, 2003 at 22:28:37:
In Reply to: 500 th board posted by Boondoggle on July 18, 2003 at 22:17:22:
"Good Evening, my fellow boarders:
Tonight I want to talk to you on a subject of deep concern to all boarders and to many people in all parts of the world -- the war in Board 500.
I believe that one of the reasons for the deep divisions about Board 500 is that many Smith fans have lost confidence in what the director has told them about our policy. The boarder people cannot and should not be asked to support a policy which involves the overriding issues of war and peace unless they know the truth about that policy.
Tonight, therefore, I would like to answer some of the question that I know are on the minds of many of you listening to me.
How and why did boarders get involved in Board 500 in the first place?
How has this Administration changed the policy of the previous administration?
What has really happened in the negotiations in Paris and on the battlefront in Board 500?
What choices do we have if we are to end the war?
What are the prospects for peace?
From a political standpoint this would have been a popular and easy course to follow. After all, we became involved in the war while my predecessor was in office. I could blame the defeat which would be the result of my action on him and come out as the peacemaker. Some put it to me quite bluntly: This was the only way to avoid allowing Boarder's war to become Smith's war. "
My little fingers are tired now....