Posted by MasterdeBater774 at ip68-227-28-57.lv.lv.cox.net on November 08, 2003 at 16:06:59:
In Reply to: Matrix Revolutions (might be spoilers, dunno yet) posted by GTJDorris on November 08, 2003 at 14:33:01:
If you didn't like the first one then obviously your not going to like the rest. To say that the movie was impossible and that stuff could never really happen then your entire opinion is useless because not only have you failed to understand it is a MOVIE but you fail to read inbetween the lines. And if the dailogue was so poor then why don't you understand it?
: 1)the acting continued to be bad. Totally and utterly unconvincing "love" between Neo and Trinity.
I don't think so
: 2)it was terribly written. The dialogue was so God damned predictable. I'd lean over and say what a character was obviously about to say, to my date before they said it (luckily she was dumb and thought I was genius)
Then why'd you watch it since your so fucking smart? The dialogue wasn't predictable that's why most people hated it because it ended the way no one expected it to.
: 3)If Neo can save Trinity one time, why not again? That's rhetorical because it doesn't make sense whatever anyone says to me.
Watch the first Matrix and listen to what Morpheus says.
: 4)How can you have a world between the fake/computer created/"Matrix" and the real/three-dimensional/solid world? You can't. There just is no correlation to reality with what those fat fucking brothers wrote.
It's a movie, if you don't like Sci-fi movies then obviously this wasn't for you therefore making your entire opinion useless.
: 5)How can a program fight deletion? It can't. It doesn't have a say in the matter. It's deleted or it isn't. Period.
Once again it's a movie.
: 6)So I guess they thought they were being very sly in transforming this into some half-assed retarded Christ figure movie. Boy that's original.
That's your opinion, i know a lot of people who liked it.... people don't know how to read inbetween the lines.
: 7)Did anyone else think the makeup on Neo's eyes looked like the worst makeup job (and story explanation of why they look that way) since THE KILLERS by John Woo when Chow Yun Fat has that big crust grow over his eyes in about 30 seconds? I mean, Neo gets hit with a cable and instantly both eyes crust over but nothing else does? That's not how a wound happens. It just doesn't.
You saw that for less then 5 minutes.
: 8)I thought the Indian people/programs were explaining to Neo that they were trying to get their daughter/program OUT of the Matrix. But then she's inside it for the rest of the movie.
No they were explaining to him that programs can love to... That part was a very significant part in the ending.
: 9)What (in terms of their fucking stupid metaphor) literally "happened" when Neo let Smith take him over? I understand "he blew them all up to save everyone" but that doesn't explain HOW he did that to a program.
It shows you don't understand Reloaded. Neo is the one because he is an unbalanced equation that the Architect said he couldn't fix despite his many times in trying. Then in Revolutions the Oracle said that Smith was Neo's negative to try to balance that equation out... when Neo let Smith take him over the equation was balanced... 1 + -1 = 0, it's really not that hard to figure out. Watch reloaded and listen to the dialogue instead of bitching about it.
: 10)There is no way for a program to copy over onto a human, the way Smith came out of the Matrix and into a human body. Can't happen. Sorry. But based on that, the second and third movies fail miserably without all these other points.
It's a fucking movie!
: 11)So at the very end instead of having a unique story/plot to base all this cool action "within the rules" (by having it taking place in computer code, not in the real world) it comes down to Neo being Jesus and Smith being the devil? That is so fucking weak!!! How fucking retarded. I loved the first one and they have totally ruined it by the garbage that came after it. And naturally if your opinion is the opposite I'm not going to convince you (because you're wrong) and you're not going to convince me (because, again, you're wrong).
No that's not exactly what it is, you could say many different things... That's why on the Matrix site they have a whole page of different philosophy's about the matrix. I'm wrong for what? liking a movie? No, Your wrong because you can't tell someone their opinion is wrong, and to do so is stupid. You never understood Reloaded don't expect to understand Revolutions.