Posted by Slavei at 4.19.96.69 on November 26, 2003 at 10:41:03:
In Reply to: Is that what you interpret.... posted by GTJDorris on November 26, 2003 at 10:36:03:
For such a widely-known periodical, they have to make sure their photographs don't look like it was taken w/a disposable camera. There's a lot of technical-hooey to do for professional pics to make 'em come out right. I'm sure you know this.
Of course I don't know what that David guy did exactly, but I'm just guessing it was a lot of set-up work. Hopefully Kevin will clear things up.