exactly


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by shitty speller...DEAL WITH IT! at 24-205-35-70.gln-eres.charterpipeline.net on February 22, 2004 at 22:50:07:

In Reply to: They didn't really have a chance, did they? posted by The Queen on February 22, 2004 at 22:42:08:

: : Then later on they branched out musically, which Nivana never did.

: Kind of difficult to evolve when you lost the key part of the band.

Nirvana had talent and were the first Huge band of the grunge era, but they never had time to expand their sound. what did htey have. 3 albums? 4? All sounded the same. I find it interesting so many people love and adore and credit Nirvana when they really only had one sound, one style. If Corgan shot himself right after Gish would he have been as big as Cobain? Im not trying to pick a fight or be rude, i just find it interesting a band like Nirvana is stilly "bigger" than the pumpkins. I think nirvana were just made huge by the media. they were the first that really had sucess with that type of music. I guess. Im tired. fuck, I can't believe they still make Tab


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

E-Mail/Userid:
Password:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


  


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]