Posted by SweetIrony at 165.134.150.47 on March 08, 2004 at 15:08:15:
In Reply to: I cringe because to this day I still get letters posted by Runshouse21 on March 08, 2004 at 14:59:33:
I knew it. Just for the record, I personally wouldn't frown on a whole operation because of one situation. I'm particulary interested in Jayson Blair, because my husband got his B.S. in Journalism and I remember some of the things he did to get quotes and stories.
: like this one.
: I only wanted to view one article, the Jacques Steinberg review of the Jason Blair book, which I believe appeared in the February 29, 2004 edition of the Times. The chances that I would use any of the remaining money in this account after the deduction for the one article that I desired to view today are virtually nil. Thus, I would, in effect, be paying the Times 7.95 for viewing one article. Thus, Jason Blair-like ethics have clearly penetrated your Times operation as well.
: ~~~~~BLAH BLAH BLAH content edit he wants us to give him free shit~~~~~
: If you fail to take these actions, , I shall file a class action lawsuit against the NY Times, because I am certain that your dishonesty, fraudulent and/or crapped up software program has ripped off other persons such as myself in like fashion. The law suit will be predicated on D.C. Code Sec. 28-3904 and 3905 k 1 c, which permits recovery of treble damages, punitive damages and attorney's fees for deceptive business practices, which are readily provable under the lenient standards of Sec. 28-3904.
: I was graduated with honors from Harvard University and Stanford U. Law School ran a litigation division for a U.S. Governement agency for several years was interviewed by the NY Times appeared in courts in approximately 25 states I do not make idle threats regarding litigation and the motivation of giving the NY Times a public bloody nose over its overreaching, egregious archival profit center appeals to my better nature. Your new archival copying fees are outrageous.