What's a harbinger? -NT-


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by JonAskew at hse-london-ppp3509092.sympatico.ca on March 01, 2002 at 01:10:01:

In Reply to: a K.Smith/Clerks/dick/fartjoke ovbservation which posted by NJStatuteSection2A170/51 on March 01, 2002 at 00:06:02:

: no one will even care about. but i will blast off on anyway, and
probably for much longer than anyone here will read. or at least like
my students do - skim....

: We all here love Kevin's work. In fact, he could show us some avant
garde bullshit of him and Walt eating Diggem Smacks for three
minutes and a lot or people here would call him a "geniusly
postmodern" film..maker

: .oh well, hes a regular Wim Wenders . . but still

: I am not comfortable, at least as a fan, artist wanna-be, and (for lack
of a better term) "literary analyst" all of his references to his films
being about dicks and farts. He claims that is all he writes many
times. And while J&SBSB is a real homosexual-referenced laden
cliché big ass dick and fart extravaganza . . . i still love it...as a fan of
VA...i like seeing all the people from all the movies. I get off on it in a
fan boy sort of way.

: However, if I could return to what has prompted me to post this
rather laborious message. I used to, and to some degree still, think
that Clerks was his best script . . .not “work” mind you as a director,
but in terms of a story laced with dick and pussy humor that has also
has a more universal message. By that I mean this:

: Yes, Amy and Dogma were highly jam packed with meaning that
Mallrats and J&SBSB lacks. But Clerks still has more of a universal
appeal that stretches into the genres of film and writing in general.
What I mean is (I wonder how many are still reading this) the end
monologues by Randal and Dante drive into the message of free will
and volition in society. Of an individual being able to create one’s
own certainty in a highly fragmented and post-modern society while
still being able to keep one’s frame of reference in today for the most
part, even if it contains a love of the pastiche’.
: And while the main characters are still the proverbial white
Anglo-Saxon male "types" I still think that he manages to provide a
more meaningful message of the ability for people to transcend the
realm of the Cartesian subject and still find the means to navigate the
uncertain realms of the “chaos theory” of reality that even Borges
would enjoy if not spit on. In other words. the signification that
Randal provides to Dante is key to the thematic meaning of Clerks.
: My point is that, I wish, and I know I can shit in my left hand and wish
with my right to see which hand fills the fastest on this, that at least
he could return his writing back to those themes. Maybe he does with
Jersey Girl . . .i don’t know, but the supposed "college" words in
Clerks as he as called them, are nothing but. They ultimately provide
a frame of reference ofr the viewers to find meaning in a text that has
layers of meaning inside of it like a cheap burrito. The thing is, I know
that he is aware of these factors and has demonstrated the ability as
a writer and artist to conceive of such matters. therefore he can do it
again. And to a degree, the Flying Car is a harbinger, if not a
reference back to what has been done .. In short...what the fuck did I
just say????

: -Eso




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

E-Mail/Userid:
Password:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


  


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]