Posted by MasterdeBater774 at ip68-227-28-57.lv.lv.cox.net on March 24, 2004 at 01:16:04:
In Reply to: I don't get it posted by Lokileby on March 24, 2004 at 01:10:16:
I find it very hard to believe that they'd unload all the passengers and load them all back on a different plane? i mean i remember them saying they found the pilots on the top of building with the cockpit they'd be able to tell if it was a different plane. And if they did put something on the bottom we'd be able to have physical evidence of it and if so why wouldn't they just put a nuclear missle on it if they hate us so much? i mean it's too bullshitty for me
I also agree with the other "theory" you would of said but you didn't. i don't want to get flamed on here becuase i plann on going to sleep soon but i know what your talkinga bout.
I quickly read the article (as it is far too late to actually have indepthly read the whole thing) and I don't get it.
: They have these opinions, and "facts" to back it up, but they don't actually prove anything.
: And unless in my quick reading I missed something, they don't actually give any actual reason.
: I have a hard time believing that at some point pilots landed the plane, switched everyone from one plane to the other, and then went back on their merry way.
: What would be the point for the terrorists to have done this? Or did I miss it and they said that someone else entirely was responsible? (That I have a hard time believing).
: I do have my own theories about the other plane, the one that never made it to its target, and instead crashed somewhere (the location escapes me) but that one is a mear political theory dealing with the heroism and subsequent politics. But I've stated it on here before and people disagree, so I won't state it again.