Posted by Stamos N Affleck at c68.187.156.41.stc.mn.charter.com on March 24, 2004 at 01:24:33:
In Reply to: I don't get it posted by Lokileby on March 24, 2004 at 01:10:16:
: I quickly read the article (as it is far too late to actually have indepthly read the whole thing) and I don't get it.
: They have these opinions, and "facts" to back it up, but they don't actually prove anything.
: And unless in my quick reading I missed something, they don't actually give any actual reason.
: I have a hard time believing that at some point pilots landed the plane, switched everyone from one plane to the other, and then went back on their merry way.
: What would be the point for the terrorists to have done this? Or did I miss it and they said that someone else entirely was responsible? (That I have a hard time believing).
: I do have my own theories about the other plane, the one that never made it to its target, and instead crashed somewhere (the location escapes me) but that one is a mear political theory dealing with the heroism and subsequent politics. But I've stated it on here before and people disagree, so I won't state it again.