Oliver Stone and Steven Soderbergh wouldn't have

Posted by Nitram at emly-385.res.umass.edu on May 21, 2002 at 11:44:11:

In Reply to: I'm not sure, but you did. And what was your posted by The Bastard (ebas420) on May 21, 2002 at 11:40:23:

...hired her if she didn't possess acting talent.

Well, maybe Oliver Stone might have hired based on look because he's totally insane, but she still did a good job in U-Turn. And she was fuckin' great in Out of Sight.

So therefore she's not like Britney because A. She can act well, B. She's proven she can act well, C. She's been an actress for a while, D. She's been in good movies, E. She has and continues to attract the interest of good directors.

Eh?

Follow Ups:

• Sorry but I still disagree with you. The Bastard (ebas420) 11:49:07 5/21/02 (15)
  • Not for anything, but... razordu30 11:52:54 5/21/02 (14)
    • Re: Not for anything, but... Kevin 12:01:56 5/21/02 (2)
      • And people think he doesn't read the board....*nt* Nitram 12:05:01 5/21/02 (0)
      • Thanks, Kev...I was wondering about this one after razordu30 12:04:30 5/21/02 (0)
    • Look at Smith though Nitram 11:56:12 5/21/02 (10)
      • they certainly have a say in it, at least sean 12:00:32 5/21/02 (0)
      • Ah, but look at the credits; Kevin Smith is also razordu30 11:58:41 5/21/02 (8)
        • Actually... Kevin 12:06:56 5/21/02 (5)
          • It's the IMDB's fault, Kevin sean 12:13:03 5/21/02 (1)
            • I know...I'm sitting here going... razordu30 12:16:19 5/21/02 (0)
          • IMDB has you as an (uncredited) producer for Dogma razordu30 12:12:03 5/21/02 (2)
            • The same movie Scott "directed"? sean 12:15:10 5/21/02 (1)
              • Oh...trust me, I agree right now.. razordu30 12:18:05 5/21/02 (0)
        • Correction...he's producer for Dogma, not JSBSB nt razordu30 11:59:54 5/21/02 (1)
          • is that supposed to prove something? sean 12:03:17 5/21/02 (0)

Post a Followup